Ads keep us online. Without them, we wouldn't exist. We don't have
paywalls or sell mods - we never will. But every month we have large bills
and running ads is our only way to cover them. Please consider unblocking us. Thank you from GameBanana <3
Now id like to hear peoples opinons on clan member numbers, now we have a pretty good team of members, and it has been brought to my attention a few times that they would like to see Dan on trial.
Well have we got enough or can we squeaze one more, bare in mnd that our Steve is heading off to the US and he will no doubt be less active, so keep that thought in mind.
Let me know what you lovely lot think......
Originally posted by Melissa ....Still VIVA LA RESISTANCE!!!! and merry christmas to the sheep inside a tube of testicular waste that goes toot toot and a train comes along and runs him over going HAHAHAHA DIE EVIL WELSH MAN and he's like NO NO SPARE MY WORTHLESS LIFE then I grab his tongue and rip it out with this SPINE still attached, I just stand there and laugh at the poor welshman. We all then go home and have tea and biscuits
I have missed this, Mel - You are my little oasis, in the desert of sanity.........
P.S. tongue....spine still attached? he musta been pretty deformed to start with, if his tongue was attached to his spine.?!
When (if) Dan gets in, we'll have a clan of 19.
It might just be my over-indulged sense of symmetry at work here, but 20 seems like a much rounder figure, would it make any more sense to have an even number of members?
just a thought,
P.S. Ste - £5 in the post, yeah?? :-p
The spam machine has gotta be good for a wee trialling (why I voted yay at the praccy),
Wear your [MCNP> tag with pride!!
P.S. Now Dan's the new boy, does that mean I can flush his head down the toilet, and nick his dinner-money??
OK, Dan's a good guy, no problems there, but where will this end? There has to be a ceiling limit on member numbers. OK, maybe this once we can make an exception, but I just don't want this clan becoming like so many others, where the members flood in and everything just gets watered down.
So for this once I say OK, but I can't guarantee I'll say the same for future additions.
Well, I don't see the harm in another member. Dan has been a regular face about the channel, on D11, and helping out at our practices when we were short of people, so I think letting him join up would be an asset to us.
After that, I'd be happy to say "doors closed to new applications".
I don't know if the fact that something happened a long time ago makes it any less valid, but here is the result of a poll we did last time member numbers was an issue.
As you can see, we have already surpassed the limit we set ourselves at the time (18 members now, not counting Asser), so Kat, I guess as cl, the choice is yours, Do we say that we already have too many members, or decide that since we have set the precedent now of ignoring our own decision, we let as many people join as we like, or perhaps hold another poll to re-decide how many members we want as a limit?
Of course, if we take the third option, who's to say in another six months, we won't be holding yet another poll on member numbers??
Democracies eh? Who'd have 'em??