Alright, enough arguing about this. Some of you keep arguing that the ban was unjust and that it was wrong, and others keep arguing about unrelated users or trying to justify some sort of innocence leading to the ban.
For those of you who keep saying that the ban was unjust and trying to argue innocence, your reason of saying it was "just two hands holding a rose" is highly incorrect given what the image was an edited version of. This user included an edited version of the goatse image in a screenshot on one of their submissions (I wouldn't advise Googling goatse since it's highly NSFW, but that's your call ) that had a rose used as a censor. Censored or not, it wasn't allowed, and this user was asked to remove it. This user instead decided it would be better to argue with site staff and say nothing was wrong with it, and when asked to remove it again, argued with site staff more. On top of several other incidents in the past where this user decided to butt heads with site staff and intentionally violate site rules or try to find ways to get around them, this is what finally lead to the ban. It wasn't as innocent as you've been lead to believe, and if you're honestly going to argue and or leave the site over something that didn't even involve you in the first place, then that's your own bloody decision. End of discussion.