Studio Owners/Members Please Read

Moderator Notice

Please be aware, this thread is 8 months old.

A reminder about rules and conduct for studios and their releases

By 2 years ago

It's been a while since we've been able to fully enforce the rules that go with studios but we will be making a concentrated effort from here-on-out to ensure studios return to their proper design.

Studios are intended to be places where members can work together - they key point being "Work Together" - to release high quality content on GameBanana. Up to now studios have had free reign and became places where individuals would release their work under a common banner but aside from that have no association to any other studio member whatsoever. This goes against what a studio is meant to be - collaborative works - rather than the current state of displaying individual portfolios for several people on one page.

In particular we are focusing on the following Studio Rules:

1.1 Quality

Studios must aspire to a high standard of workmanship. Studios releasing poor quality content will be removed.

1.4 Team

The purpose of a studio is to provide a common platform for people to work together. For this reason, studios and studio releases must have a minimum of two members/authors.

1.5 Submissions

Studios must only make studio releases when the release has been developed by the studio - minimum two contributing authors. Studios found to be releasing works they are not responsible for will be removed (Ex: Uploading 'Googled' Images).

The entire list of rules can be found here.

What About Old Submissions? (Pre-GameBanana)

We cannot enforce this rule retroactively as we don't have the information showing when people left and joined studios before the move to GameBanana.

Most studios will be affected by us enforcing these rules again, but it will bring back true purpose to why they exist, for members of different skillsets to come together and create amazing releases for the GameBanana Community. For some of the specialized studios this may mean closing shop in a sense since the content they release isn't something easily shared between colleagues, all I can say about that is perhaps your group doesn't fit together as a collaborate studio but rather a club of like-minded artists and I'd highly encourage you to save any relevant information/studio information for when Clubs/Clans make a return to the site.

I'm afraid I cannot give an ETA on when clubs will return but I expect many studios will move their rosters to that section once it's made available.


If you have any questions about the above rules or any of the rules in general please leave a comment below and we'll do our best to answer it. I know we have already been speaking to a few studios already but we can't get around to everyone. Please forward fellow studio members etc to this thread,

Thanks

71 posts 3,565 views
  • You must be a member

Replies

  • Rafael De Jongh's Levels
    • P3: Peasant
      Points: 19,271
    • E3: Tutor
      EF: 72
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Skinning/Modelling Expert
    Posted 1 year ago

    I'd say no! Other Studio's that don't got anything to do with GB DO got their individual projects though they are as well released under the Studio...

    Therefor I'd say change the min people that require to work on the submission for it becomes a Studio Release, and make it to the submitter's choose if they want to release it under the Studio or Not...

    A Club is something completely different and that's another big ball of bullshit to get in to...

    • Agree x 2
    User Title
    2D/3D Artist
  • Crash's Levels
    • P4: Worker
      Points: 26,142
    • E3: Tutor
      EF: 55
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A4: Graduate
      Account Age: 4 years
    Username
    Crash
    Posted 1 year ago

    Learn when to quit.

    Posted by Logan Dougall

    Here's a short little thing to think about:

    What if you could associate a submission release with a Club rather than a Collab Studio?

    For example, a 'Top Spray Artists of GB' club where people could request to join and if accepted, display their content same as selecting a studio release?

    I'd prefer to keep Studios true to their purpose; so if it's just a common area for artists to link their work to that you want, then I believe an addition to clubs would be more appropriate and much less restrictive.

    Here's a short little thing to think about:

    What if you took that stick out of your ass already? You are again mentioning something entirely different to avoid the subject.

    I'd prefer to keep Studios true to their purpose

    The 2 members minimum rule is a rule you made up and nobody likes it. The rule didn't exist at any point in the GB history until around 8 months ago. Its the opinion of the community that matters, not yours. Banana>Logan.

    I'm going to come forward an say it; You are being an ass. No, I do not mean to insult you in any way, I'm just saying that you're being stubborn and irrational. Its pretty much obvious at this point that the rule will be changed whether you like it or not, since everyone is against your opinion.

    • Agree x 2
    • Dumb x 1
  • IppE's Levels
    • P3: Peasant
      Points: 21,802
    • E1: Helper
      EF: 12
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Username
    IppE
    Posted 1 year ago

    • Funny x 4
    • Interesting x 1
    • Win x 1
    • Dumb x 1
    • Disagree x 1
    • wtf x 1
    • Rude x 1
    User Title
    Misfortune
  • tom's Levels
    • P1: Beggar
      Points: 298
    • E1: Helper
      EF: 2
    • C6: Super Admin
    • A7: Legend
      Account Age: 12 years
    Posted 1 year ago

    Didn't realize this was 8 months old. My earlier comment sounded dumb.

    Anyway, after hearing some heartfelt pleas from some members, I think we should amend the mandatory collaboration rule in the following way:

    • If the member has made at least FIVE 9/10+ submissions in a single section they may represent themselves as a Studio.

    I base this off a couple of things:

    • Single member Studios allow a single member to act as a representative for a larger group of artists that don't have or don't want accounts on GameBanana. Some well known modelers/skinners/animators that appear in many skin credits have never been site members.
    • GameBanana is designed and programmed by what is essentially a 1 person studio too (me). So it makes sense from my personal experience to allow the same on GameBanana - a single person can be an "entity" if they want to be.

    Does this sound like a reasonable compromise? Should we have additional requirements?

    • Agree x 2
    • Win x 2
    • Thanks x 2
    • Helpful x 1
    testing 1 2 3 4
  • deadman22's Levels
    • P2: Drudge
      Points: 2,272
    • E3: Tutor
      EF: 41
    • C4: Super Moderator
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Username
    deadman22
    Posted 1 year ago

    So can I get my studio Dead Art untrashed?

    User Title
    I Drink Your MILKSHAKE!
  • FallDown's Levels
    • P1: Beggar
      Points: 381
    • E1: Helper
      EF: 12
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A6: Elder
      Account Age: 7 years
    Username
    FallDown
    Posted 1 year ago

    I think working as a team in studios should be encouraged, and people should seriously consider if their submission truly represents their studio or themselves as an individual artist.

    Studios have rankings and carry a sort of 'brand' name with them, and I get that members want to benefit their studio. Because of the prestige that a studio release can give you and your submission, it can be mutually beneficial to release a submission under a studio, rather than as a individual. This can work as a sort of motivator, just as ranks motivate people and studios to work harder.

    In the end I think the most important thing is releasing quality submissions, if allowing people to release individual work under a studio helps that, then I'm all for it. The responsiblity should lie with the user, not the moderators. If your studio had nothing to do with your work, then consider releasing as an individual.

    User Title
    TheSystem
  • natko's Levels
    • P6: Merchant
      Points: 251,431
    • E1: Helper
      EF: 1
    • C5: Admin
    • A7: Legend
      Account Age: 12 years
    Username
    natko
    Posted 1 year ago

    Posted by deadman22

    So can I get my studio Dead Art untrashed?

    Done. Submit a join request now.

    Bananite
  • deadman22's Levels
    • P2: Drudge
      Points: 2,272
    • E3: Tutor
      EF: 41
    • C4: Super Moderator
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Username
    deadman22
    Posted 1 year ago

    Posted by natko

    Posted by deadman22

    So can I get my studio Dead Art untrashed?

    Done. Submit a join request now.

    submitted one.

    User Title
    I Drink Your MILKSHAKE!
  • Rafael De Jongh's Levels
    • P3: Peasant
      Points: 19,271
    • E3: Tutor
      EF: 72
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Skinning/Modelling Expert
    Posted 1 year ago

    Alright great that we've come to an agreement that is suitable for all Members and Studio Members!

    Good Decision Tom!

    User Title
    2D/3D Artist
  • Win-Zip's Levels
    • P1: Beggar
      Points: 15
    • E2: Guide
      EF: 20
    • C2: Treehouse Member
    • A5: Veteran
      Account Age: 5 years
    Username
    Win-Zip
    Posted 1 year ago

    Thank you Tom.

    • Agree x 1
    User Title
    Grand Theft Ecstasy
  • You must be a member